|
Monetary Department
The Money and Capital Markets: Annual Survey, 1999
Chapter 1 - preliminary release
Chapter 1 (Zipped Word document)
CHAPTER 1: MAIN DEVELOPMENTS
1.1 INFLATION AND MONETARY DEVELOPMENTS
The consumer price index rose by 1.3 percent
in 1999, the lowest rate of increase for the last three decades and lower
than the 4 percent inflation target for the year. This low level of inflation
during the calendar year is attributed to a 1.4 percent drop in prices
in the first quarter that was temporary and came as a reaction to the exceptional
6.4 percent rise in prices at the end of 1998. During the last nine months
of the year, prices actually rose by an annual rate of 3.8 percent. A longer
term perspective, from the time that inflation began to fall (from August
1997 to the end of 1999), shows an annual inflation rate of 4.4 percent
(compared with 10 percent in 1995 and 1996), which was close to the targeted
range of inflation for 1999. At the end of 1999 and at the beginning of
2000, the pace of price increases slowed, and inflation expectations for
a year ahead dropped to a level of 3 percent, which was at the lower limit
of the inflation target for the next two years.
The relative stability in the financial markets
during 1999 and the decline in inflation helped the government to set an
inflation target for two years, at an annual rate of 3-4 percent. This
decision, the first of its kind, was taken as part of the government’s
resolutions concerning fiscal policy and the size of the budget deficit.
These developments place the economy in a convenient position for achieving
an inflation rate of between 3-4 percent. In the future, the retention
of the inflation rate within the targeted range may make it possible to
relax monetary policy by facilitating a gradual reduction in the nominal
interest rate without any concurrent increase in inflation expectations.
Such a process would lead to a gradual decline in the real interest rate
to levels that are considered typical in the developed countries.
Although the inflation rate has fallen, it
should be realized that we have not yet reached the inflation environment
acceptable in developed countries. The inflation rate has yet to stabilize
at a new low level, with the result that individuals and companies still
have to take inflation into account in their economic considerations. Contracts
and wage agreements are still affected by indexation considerations, and
accounting practice has not been adjusted to moderate rates of inflation.
Other indicators that inflation has not yet been consolidated at a low
rate are the large proportion of indexed components in portfolios of assets
and liabilities, the composition of the government debt, most of which
is indexed, and the still excessively high levels of inflation expectations
and nominal interest rates. The intensity of the downturn in inflation
during 1999 appears to have come as a surprise that was not foreseen by
the public. This is apparent from forecasters’ monthly assessments and
from the slow pace of decline in inflation expectations for a year. In
the course of the year, various elements of uncertainty actually led to
a rise in these expectations: assessments that the budget deficit would
exceed its planned level, fears of a depreciation as a result of the Millenium
Bug, and uncertainty over the new government’s attitude to inflation targets.
Only towards the end of the year did inflation expectations fall to any
appreciable extent, to 3 percent, which was at the lower limit of the range
of inflation targeted for the next two years.
Monetary policy during 1999 must be interpreted
against the background of the rapid depreciation of the sheqel at the end
of 1998. This depreciation was caused by the worldwide financial crisis
and the resulting rise in prices, which threatened to lead to an upsurge
in inflation. At the end of 1998, the interest rate was raised by 4 percent
in response to the crisis. The interest rate hike helped to prevent a one-time
rise in prices from developing into a continued upturn in inflation.
During 1999, a cautious and gradual reduction
in the interest rate was a necessary component of monetary policy. A cautious
approach was particularly important in view of past attempts at a rapid
reduction in the interest rate that led to an upsurge in inflationary pressures,
and to a rise in inflation expectations. The real interest rate, which
is calculated on the basis of the Bank of Israel’s interest rate less inflation
expectations derived from the capital market for the term of a year, was
1.4 percent higher in 1998 (7.4 percent compared with 6 percent) than the
level considered acceptable in developed countries. This indicates that
the disinflation process is not yet complete. (See Box A-3 in our survey
for 1998.)
At the beginning of the year, the exchange rate
fell, there was no rise in inflation and inflation expectations stabilized
at 5.5 percent after reaching a level of 9 percent at the end of 1998.
As a result of these developments and against the background of the recession
in economic activity, the Bank of Israel began to cut the monetary interest
rate in a gradual and cautious manner. During this period, the negative
slopes of nominal yield curves (for T-bills and Shahar bonds) as well as
the slope of the CPI-indexed bond yield curve were indicative of the public’s
assessments that the decrease in nominal and real interest rates would
continue. When the uncertainty in the financial markets increased during
the months of April and May due to the approach of the elections, demand
for foreign currency rose together with the exchange rate, and inflation
expectations for a year exceeded 6 percent (according to forecasters and
capital market data). The nominal and real yield curves became flat, a
development indicative of a more severe monetary restraint as well as a
decline in the real interest rate. The Bank of Israel decided not to continue
with its reduction of the interest rate, due to the assessment that the
actual level of the interest rate would in the final account make it possible
to achieve the inflation target for 1999. The uncertainty in the markets
continued until a new government was formed, a budgetary framework was
determined, and an inflation target was set for 2000 and 2001.
Inflation expectations fell in the wake of the
government’s decision to support the existing monetary policy by setting
an annual inflation target of from 3 to 4 percent for the next two years,
the lower than expected rate of price increases during the months September-November,
and the moderate growth in the means of payment. The Bank of Israel cut
the interest rate in the last quarter of the year to a level of 11.3 percent
in December. At the end of 1999, inflation expectations for a year derived
from the capital market reached 3 percent. Although expectations for longer
terms exceeded 4 percent, this rate appeared to include a risk premium
for investment in unlinked assets. At the beginning of January 2000, inflation
expectations for long terms of up to five years stabilized within the targeted
range of inflation. Following the 4 percent interest rate hike at the end
of 1998, the Bank of Israel began to gradually cut the interest rate, by
modest rates of between 0.3 percent and 0.5 percent. The interest rate
was not raised even during periods when inflation expectations rose. This
was due to the assessment that the policy that had been adopted in the
past would in the future lead to a convergence of inflation expectations
and actual inflation to within the targeted range.
The narrow money supply (M1) expanded by 9 percent
during the first eleven months of 1999, following respective increases
of 14 percent and 13 percent in 1998 and 1997. Estimated money demand as
determined by the nominal GDP growth rate and interest rates was only slightly
less than the actual amount during this period, and did not lead to a rise
in prices. In December 1999, due to the liquidity fears associated with
the Millenium Bug problem, the public temporarily increased their holdings
of cash by NIS 1.5 billion (6 percent of the total means of payment). Credit
to the public expanded by 12 percent in 1999. The proportion to total credit
of foreign currency linked and dcredit was similar to that at the end of
1998 and amounted to 38 percent.
The exchange rate of the sheqel against the
currency basket was located 12 percent above the lower limit of the band
of mobility in the course of the year. This rate was subject to fluctuations
of some 3.5 percent, without the Bank of Israel intervening in foreign
currency trading. During the past two years, the exchange rate of the sheqel
has risen by an annual average of 9 percent, compared with an increase
of slightly more than 5 percent in the consumer price index and a 4.5 percent
annual average dollar decrease in import prices. This indicates that the
sheqel depreciated in real terms during those two years, a development
that was to be expected in view of the slowdown in local activity and the
rise in the unemployment rate.
Following a rapid 20 percent depreciation during
the months August-October 1998, when the exchange rate moved away from
the lower limit of the diagonal band, the rate fell again and a nominal
appreciation of 3 percent was recorded during the whole of 1999. The only
exceptional developments in the course of the year were a number of rapid
depreciations during the months April-May that resulted from pre-election
uncertainty, and depreciations in August that resulted from uncertainty
over the new government’s fiscal policy and whether the policy of setting
declining inflation targets would be continued. In the course of the year,
the daily and monthly volatility of the exchange rate was less than that
among the world’s major currencies (see Chapter 2).
The public’s risk assessment, as reflected by
the premium on the dollar options issued by the Bank of Israel, rose sharply
at the end of 1998 due to the large and unexpected fluctuations in the
exchange rate of the dollar. This premium gradually fell in the course
of the year and mainly at the end of the year, as the inflation rate fell
and the foreign currency market became relatively stable. The developments
in the foreign currency market during 1999 increased the public’s awareness
of the risk premiums involved in foreign currency activity. As a result,
the non-banking private sector’s purchases of instruments for hedging against
financial and non-financial developments increased by 40 percent in 1999.
Concurrently, the Banking Supervision Department imposed more stringent
requirements on the banks with respect to the control of the risk exposure
incurred by borrowers of foreign currency credit.
Foreign residents continued to invest in Israel
during 1999 (a total of $4 billion), directly and by purchasing shares
that Israeli companies issued abroad. At the same time, Israeli residents
increased their investments abroad (to $1.6 billion) with funds deriving
from issues abroad and as a substitute for deposits with banks in Israel.
Liberalization measures appear to have increased the financial openness
of the economy, which thereby increased the finance and investment opportunities
available to Israeli residents. The growth in capital imports and exports
reflects a healthy development of the foreign currency market. This development
is particularly positive when we remember the large flows of capital in
a single direction only, which prompted the public to sell or buy large
amounts of foreign currency. Past experience of the proper functioning
of the foreign currency market in the absence of Bank of Israel intervention
within the limits of the diagonal band, supports the approach that the
central bank adopted when the effect of the world financial crisis at the
end of 1998 were apparent: a policy of non-intervention in trading following
demand surpluses and a more rapid depreciation. (See Chapters 1 and 2 of
our survey for 1998.) The liberalization of the foreign currency controls
and the functioning of the market without central bank intervention are
an important element in maintaining the structural stability of the money
and capital markets.
The total budget deficit planned for 1999 was
2 percent of GDP. By April, it was assumed that the actual deficit and
particularly the domestic budget deficit would be much higher. Accordingly,
the government decided to amend the Law for the Reduction of the Budget
Deficit for 2000 and the following years (the third upward adjustment since
the initial legislation in this respect in 1992), and the deficit target
for 2000 was raised from 1.75 percent to 2.5 percent of GDP. At the time,
it did indeed appear that the deficit for 1999 would exceed 3 percent of
GDP, while the proposed budget was not regarded as having a potentially
expansionary effect on domestic demand. However, a change in a long-term
target that is anchored in legislation, precisely when an effort should
be made to adhere to the target, harms the government’s credibility.
At the end of the year, it transpired that the
actual deficit was 2.25 percent of GDP, only 0.25 percent more than the
targeted level, accentuating the fact that the total deficit planned for
2000 is higher than the actual deficit for 1999. This reveals the need
to improve the methods used in planning and monitoring the management of
the budget. Due to the growth in economic activity, it already became clear
in 1999 itself that the decrease in tax receipts was less than the updated
estimate, as was the case with the excess level of the total budget deficit.
If this trend continues and the actual increase in tax receipts during
2000 exceeds the planned increase, the incremental revenue should be used
to achieve a more rapid decrease in the deficit, in line with the government’s
declared intention. This will contribute to a decrease in the debt and
the interest burden, and will enable the budget to be more flexible in
the future. Since Israel’s debt-GDP ratio is high by international standards,
persistent progress in reducing the budget deficit is necessary. Among
other benefits, this will make it possible to achieve the inflation target
by means of a less restrictive monetary policy.
The decrease in public spending proportionate
to GDP ceased in the second half of the 1990’s despite the continued decline
in the defense burden. For this process to resume, a fundamental change
in the composition of public spending in order to reduce the tax burden
would appear to be necessary. At the end of 1999, a committee was appointed
for the purpose of formulating recommendations for changes in all aspects
of the tax system (labor and capital). The changes are intended to correct
the distortions involved in the large number of individual tax exemptions
and concessions, which have created relatively high tax margins on wages,
on the one hand, and numerous discriminatory effective yields on different
channels of saving, on the other hand. A reform in these areas is essential,
and could enhance the functioning of the labor and capital markets.
In contrast to previous years when the inflation
target was set for one year only, in 1999 the government set an inflation
target for two years. This was an important step in consolidating the process
of disinflation and in achieving the aspiration for price stability. The
setting of longer-term objectives enhances the credibility of the government
and the Bank of Israel in the eyes of the public, leads to increased certainty,
makes it possible to sign long-term contracts based on nominal terms, and
introduces an element of flexibility in the management of current monetary
policy in order to accommodate deviations from the inflation target. This
is a another key measure in the series of institutional changes that have
occurred in recent years, and include the Law Prohibiting Monetary Financing
of Budget Deficits, the Law for the Reduction of the Budget Deficit and
the actual improvement during the 1990’s in the process of decision-making
regarding the inflation target. In this respect, it is important to emphasize
the need to update all of the provisions of the Bank of Israel Law in the
spirit of the recommendations of the Levin Committee, namely the definition
of the Bank of Israel’s function in achieving and maintaining price stability,
enhancing the transparency of policy and tlevel of reporting to the public,
independence in operating monetary instruments and the creation of a broader
base for monetary policy decision-making, by establishing an independent
monetary committee as is the practice in developed countries. Once low
rates of inflation are achieved, the potential for divergent trends between
the development of the exchange rate and the rise in local prices will
disappear. This is in view of the broad diagonal band of exchange rate
mobility and the free movement of the exchange rate, which obviate the
need for administrative exchange rate adjustments, with all their potential
for inducing destabilizing capital movements.
The GDP growth rate for 1999 is estimated at
2 percent. The second half of the year was notable for a 5.4 percent rate
of growth that would appear to mark an end to the growth recession that
has prevailed in the economy for the past three years. But despite this
higher rate of growth, the unemployment rate continued to rise and reached
a level of 8.9 percent in 1999, compared with an average of 8.1 percent
in 1997 and 1998. The labor market is usually slow to respond to an upsurge
in economic activity. This is because initially, until the growth in demand
is sustained, employers fully utilize their existing labor force and do
not recruit more workers. As stated, the second half of 1999 saw an upturn
in demand, which was led by a rise in private consumption, exports, tourism
and investment in machinery. Due to the depressed level of economic activity,
the growth in demand did not lead to a more rapid pace of price increases,
and the level of activity appears to be low relative to the economy’s growth
potential. The growth in demand, which was centered in the second half
of the year, led to a rise in imports and to an increase in the current
account deficit, which reached $1.7 billion in 1999 compared with $0.7
billion in 1998. It should be noted that the decline in activity during
recent years resulted from both a drop in demand and from structural factors
on the supply side (see below). The extent of the inflationary pressures
that might be caused by the beginning of the recovery is therefore uncertain.
(See Chapter 1 of our survey for 1998.)
Two long-term phenomena apparent in the economy
should be mentioned here: On the one hand, the rate of growth in investments
in high tech industries increased greatly in 1999 as the world’s stock
markets recovered. On the other hand, the economy’s continued exposure
to competing imports had the effect of reducing activity in the traditional
industries. Moreover, foreign currency investments in high tech companies
held down the rate of increase in the exchange rate, requiring the traditional
export industries to increase their efficiency. It should be noted that
this structural change is not affected by monetary policy and is in fact
inevitable in the long term. The structural change occurring in the economy,
led by sectors where the economy enjoys a relative advantage, will make
it possible to realize the economy’s growth potential. In the longer term,
this will contribute to an increase in the welfare of the entire population.
1.2 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CAPITAL MARKET
Long-term interest rates continued to rise in
1999 although to a lesser extent than in 1998, and reached a real average
annual level of over 5 percent for a term of ten years a more. The high
interest rates resulted from the growth in the domestic budget deficit
and the financing requirements for it during the year, and from the continued
policy of monetary restraint. The higher rates also derived from the reduced
attractiveness of indexed assets as the inflation environment stabilized
at a low level. The public’s penchant for holding indexed assets appears
to have lessened, thereby requiring higher yields than in the past. The
rise in indexed interest rates was also reflected by the higher interest
rates in the mortgage market.
The rise in long-term interest rates, from 2-3
percent at the beginning of 1999 to 4-5 percent at the end of the year,
is connected with the increased rate of return on capital. The increased
rate of return accompanied the growth in demand for venture capital investments
in new areas of technology and the new investment opportunities that became
available in the world’s stock markets as the result of a progressive liberalization
in the course of the decade. The increased rate of return on capital also
derived from the expansion of the labor force and the stock of human capital
that resulted from the wave of mass immigration at the beginning of the
1990’s. The ratio of capital to GDP has not yet returned to the levels
prevailing prior to the onset of mass immigration.
The rise in interest rates during the 1990’s
is also attributed to their low level at the beginning of the decade, a
result of institutional investors’ (primarily the provident funds’) obligation
to invest a large proportion of their assets in indexed government bonds
and of the absence of investment alternatives abroad. As stated, the opening
up of the markets led to a rise in the long-term yield in the indexed bond
market, a rise that was supported by the large-scale move from the provident
funds to other assets. In addition, the continued sale of earmarked bonds
to the pension funds had the effect of diverting assets to them and reducing
the accrual in other forms of indexed saving, primarily the provident funds.
This led to an increased supply in the market for tradable bonds and to
a continued rise in their yields. It should be noted that real long-term
interest rates in Israel are little different from those in those in developed
countries (approximately 3-4 percent).
The public’s financial asset portfolio grew
by 19 percent in real terms during 1999 to a total of NIS 1,000 billion.
A contributory factor was the increase in the weighting of shares from
16 percent at the end of 1998 to 22 percent at the end of 1999 that resulted
from a rise of over 60 percent in their prices. Another major development
was the decrease in the proportion of CPI-indexed assets from 46 percent
at the end of 1998 to 39 percent at the end of 1999. This decrease was
larger in 1999, a trend that has continued since the disinflation process
began in 1985, and indicates that the public are now more convinced that
the inflation environment has become established at a lower level. Unlinked
sheqel assets continued to expand, albeit at a moderate rate, and their
weighting in the portfolio reached 26 percent at the end of 1998 compared
with only 11 percent at the beginning of the decade. The increase in the
proportion of unlinked sheqel assets within the asset portfolio was centered
in the second half of the decade and derived, as stated, from the high
yield on them. Nineteen ninety nine was notable for a growth in deposits
for terms of a year and more.
As stated, share prices rose by over 60 percent
in 1999, in line with the upturn in prices on world stock markets and,
following a break during the second half of 1998, in continuation of a
trend that began in 1997. The rise in share prices appears to be connected
with the decline in the inflation environment and the expectation of a
cut in the interest rate, the assessment that the recession was ending,
the renewal of the peace process and the resumption of growth in the economy.
The rise in share prices (which occurred despite the rise in interest rates)
did not lead to a growth in issues on the local market, and in 1999 as
well the majority of stock issues by Israeli companies were floated on
foreign stock markets. Some 80 percent of share issues were floated abroad,
mainly in the United States, where the most notable issues were those by
the software and communications industry (see Chapter 5). This is a further
indication of the liberalization that has occurred in the economy and the
financial markets, but does not explain why the volume of issues in Israel
was so sparse.
The absence of long-term institutional investors
appears to have been largely responsible for the low weighting of the local
equity market in the allocation of capital in the economy,which is continuing
to rely principally on sources of finance from the banking system. This
phenomenon contrasts with the worldwide trend of a complementary relationship
and competition between financial intermediation by banks and intermediation
via the capital market, concurrent with an increase in the market’s sophistication
and diversification, a situation that contributes to the immunity of the
entire financial system. In the long run, the lack of reform in the capital
market and the continued concentration in the banking system due to the
banks’ control of the principal financial intermediaries will impair the
development of the capital market, the development of the stock market
and its ability to compete with worldwide stock markets, and the allocation
of sources in the economy.
The government did not exploit the buoyant state
of the equity market in order to continue the privatization process, from
which receipts were NIS 2.5 billion less than planned in the budget. The
government therefore increased its domestic borrowing to NIS 7.4 billion
compared with the originally planned level of NIS 2.6 billion. Issues of
tradable borrowing instruments were notable for an increase in the proportion
of unlinked assets from 40 percent in 1998 to 57 percent in 1999. The cost
of domestic borrowing rose by more than half a percent and reached 5.4
percent. This was due to the rise in yields on CPI-indexed bonds and to
the increased cost of unlinked borrowing, which resulted from the decline
in inflation and from the fact that this borrowing is for relatively short
terms, on which interest rates are higher than on longer terms. In 1999
and in the previous year, the insurance companies initiated special arrangements
whereby they agreed to redeem early part of the earmarked bonds issued
to them in the past in return for waiving the right to purchase earmarked
bonds in the future. The Finance Ministry accepted their proposal, and
the arrangements were implemented in the form of a tender during the year.
For the treasury, the main advantage is the increased number of players
in the tradable bond market, which helps to expand the market (see also
Box 4-2).
The government debt relative to GDP fell to
103 percent, following an exceptional increase at the end of 1998 that
resulted from the faster pace of depreciation and inflation. The debt to
GDP ratio is a particularly important indicator for assessing the market’s
status, which affects the terms and opportunities for raising capital in
international markets. Since 1995, the decrease in the ratio, which exceeded
130 percent at the beginning of the decade, has slowed appreciably. This
development appears to have resulted from the slower rate of economic growth
concurrent with a slower decrease in the total budget deficit and an increase
in the cost of domestic borrowing. Apart from a resumption of growth, it
is necessary to reduce the total budget deficit persistently and scrupulously.
It would in fact be desirable to create a budget surplus in order to continue
reducing the debt to GDP ratio and thereby also cut the cost of rolling
over the debt.
As for the pension funds, reform must be implemented
if financial savings are to be channeled into financing investments in
the business sector via the equity market and the tradable bond markets.
This is in order to ensure that the financing of private sector investment
does not remain the almost exclusive preserve of the banking sector. The
lack of long-term investors is also apparent in the mortgage market, and
in the financing of long-term private investments in infrastructure and
other industries.
The expansion of the scope of pension arrangements
and a move from an unfunded pension to a funded pension concurrent with
a decrease in the weighting of the provident funds, is turning the pension
funds into long-term centers of saving. However, preventing the pension
funds from participating in tradable markets is a regressive step in the
reform process, which holds back a growth in the tradable debt at the expense
of the non-tradable portion of the debt. This situation impedes the management
of the current government debt and the construction of a tradable government
bond market, which could serve as a benchmark and contribute to the development
of the corporate bond market.
The trading methods on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
were improved considerably during 1999 with the transfer of derivative
assets to the TACT, Tel Aviv Continuous Trading System (the “Retsef” system
in Hebrew). In the near future, this will make it possible to expand the
range of contracts to additional underlying assets such as interest rates
and the CPI, and will help to increase the sophistication of the money
and capital markets.
Table 1-1. Principal Indicators of Inflation, Monetary
Policy, and the Money
andCapital Markets, 1994-99
(Percent)
| |
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
|
Inflation1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation target
|
8.0
|
8-11
|
8-10
|
7-10
|
7-10
|
4.0
|
|
Actual
|
14.5
|
8.1
|
10.6
|
7.0
|
8.6
|
1.3
|
|
Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal interest rate on Bank of Israel tenders2
|
13.4
|
15.6
|
16.3
|
14.7
|
12.6
|
13.0
|
|
Real yield-to-maturity on 3-year bonds3
|
2.8
|
4.2
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
5.2
|
5.7
|
|
Real yield-to-maturity on 10-year bonds3
|
3.2
|
4.5
|
4.5
|
4.0
|
4.9
|
5.1
|
|
Rates of depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Against the currency basket4
|
5.4
|
5.8
|
3.0
|
3.7
|
20.6
|
-2.5
|
|
Against the dollar4
|
1.8
|
3.1
|
5.0
|
7.9
|
18.2
|
0.4
|
|
Against the DM4
|
10.7
|
12.5
|
-2.5
|
-5.9
|
25.9
|
-13.3
|
|
Total nominal yield on shares5
|
-39.4
|
14.0
|
-1.0
|
35.2
|
3.1
|
64.4
|
|
Monetary aggregates (nominal rates
of change)4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrow monetary base (M1)
|
5.0
|
16.5
|
12.3
|
14.1
|
12.7
|
18.6
|
|
Total credit (C3)
|
25.2
|
23.2
|
20.0
|
17.2
|
17.3
|
13.8
|
|
Actual budget deficit (percentage of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic deficit, excluding credit
|
2.0
|
3.2
|
4.6
|
3.1
|
2.9
|
3.1
|
|
Total deficit, excluding credit
|
2.4
|
4.2
|
3.9
|
2.8
|
2.4
|
2.2
|
|
Additional data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bal. of paymts. current account deficit ($b.)6
|
3.4
|
5.2
|
5.3
|
3.4
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
|
Unemployment rate
|
8.5
|
6.9
|
6.6
|
7.6
|
8.5
|
8.9
|
|
GDP growth rate7
|
7.0
|
6.5
|
4.6
|
2.9
|
2.2
|
2.0
|
1 Consumer price index during the year.
2 Effective rate.
3 Gross annual average yield for the terms
in question.
4 December average compared with same for
previous year.
5 Year-end compared with end of previous year.
6 New definition. The difference between this
and the old definition is that under the latter, capital transfers (principally
immigrants’ transfers) are deducted from the rest of the deficit while
under the new definition, these transfers are classified in the capital
account and are not deducted from the current deficit.
7 Annual average compared with same for previous
year.
|